(VI) The Right to Grow Your Own Food Is Being Hijacked by the Federal Government / DARK Act would cause America’s crop fields to be saturated with cancer-causing glyphosate (DM)
The president signed another executive order for the dark cabal. This one takes away our right to grow our own food. Although we need to remain vigilant on what the cabal is doing, these executive orders and legislation like the DARK Act are being done by the U.S. Corporation. When the NESARA announcements are made, the U.S. Corporation will be exposed and shown to be insolvent. It will be replaced with the new U.S. Republic. At that point all executive orders and legislation passed by the U.S. Corporation, including admiralty law (U.S. Codes) will be declared null and void. Our whole justice system will replaced with common law, which is what this country was founded upon. â€“MrT.
The Right to Grow Your Own Food Is Being Hijacked by the Federal Government
Self-sustainability needs to be protected
August 8, 2015
In a document quietly signed into law a few years ago, your right to grow your own food was surreptitiously taken away and given to the Federal government through the right of â€˜seizureâ€™ given to the Feds, by the Feds. Was this a preemptive strike to make all Americans dependent upon corporations like Monsanto, Syngenta, Dow, Bayer, etc. for food?
The document is titled In this 10-page document the federal government declares its right to seize control of many things, from â€˜all forms of energyâ€™ to â€˜all useable water sourcesâ€™, and perhaps most alarming:
â€œAll commodities and products that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or animals.â€
That means food.
Though orders like these have admittedly been issued at different times since the Cold War, they smack of totalitarian control over all the vital resources of our nation, right down to the organic broccoli or non-GMO potatoes that you might want to grow in your own backyard
This isnâ€™t the only legislation that we should be wary of, though. Bills S.425 and H.R.875 were introduced both in the House and Senate of the US Congress by Democrat Rosa DeLauro. This is concerning because Rosa De Lauro is married to Stanley Greenberg, who is Chairman and CEO of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research. Â This entity hasÂ carried out work for Biotech Company Monsanto.
Fortunately, Bill S.425 and H.R. 875 were not enacted, but they were attempts by Big Ag to instill a total monopoly over our food supply.
In fact, the primary aim of these bills is to completely industrialize all food production in America. If these bills or future similar bills (like the DARK Act) are implemented, it would be illegal to grow food in our gardens, and even illegal to give that food away to our friends and family.
Other parts of these bills attempt to restrict and control the usage of valuable minerals and vitamins that have proven beneficial effects on peopleâ€™s well-being. You can bet that Big Pharma had its say in developing those portions. Or are Big Ag and Big Pharma really just one in the same?
You can come up with your own conclusion, but the political breadcrumbs are there for those with eyes to see.
Please sign the and put pressure on O to keep his . â€“MrT.
DARK Act would cause America’s crop fields to be saturated with cancer-causing glyphosate
By David Gutierrez, staff writer
Friday, August 07, 2015
(NaturalNews) A bill pending before the U.S. Senate would not just deny consumers the right to know whether their food contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs), it could also strip states of their right to limit or regulate the use of dangerous herbicide chemicals widely sprayed over fields of GMO crops.
The bill in question, which passed a vote in the House of Representatives of July 22, is formally known as H.R. 1599, the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, but has come to be known by organic and natural foods advocates as the Deny Americans the Right to Know (DARK) Act. That’s because far from ensuring accurate food labeling, the bill is actually designed to prevent the implementation of mandatory GMO labeling laws.
Bans any GMO labeling with teeth
A clear response by the GMO industry to the recent passage of mandatory labeling law in Vermont, the DARK Act would ban state governments from adopting any law involving the labeling of GMO foods. It would ban private GMO-free labels. It would even ban the federal government – specifically, the FDA – from adopting any mandatory labeling rule.
Instead, the DARK Act would institute a voluntary GMO labeling effort administered by the federal government. Under that scheme, food producers would need to pay the government to have their food labeled “GMO free.” Companies that did not want their food labeled GMO free, including all those making food with GMOs, of course, would pay nothing.
“And why should the burden of labeling fall on the producers of non-GMO foods, when the risk factor is associated with those foods that do contain ?” asked the Organic Consumers Association in response.
It should come as no surprise that the GMO industry-backed bill is packaged in deceptive language. The industry-funded front group behind the bill, the “Coalition for Safe and Affordable Food,” was directly lying to members of Congress, telling them that mandatory labeling would cost individual U.S. consumers $500 per year in increased food costs. But that statistic comes from only a single study, paid for by the Council for Biotech Information, whose members include Monsanto. That study has been repeatedly been debunked by independent research.
Bans regulation of toxic chemicals?
While most coverage of the DARK Act has focused on its impacts on GMO labeling, the law contains another, even more sinister provision: It bans states or counties from passing any laws regulating GMO crops at all. That might mean the federal government could try to block states from regulating the herbicides sprayed on GMO fields – proven toxic chemicals such as glyphosate (Roundup) and 2,4-D that have been linked to cancer, hormonal problems, suppressed immune function and Parkinson’s disease.
Because most GMO crops are engineered to be resistant to these herbicides, the chemicals are sprayed in enormous quantities across the 72 percent of U.S. cropland (228 million acres) that are planted with GMOs. This includes fields within a stone’s throw of schools, churches and other residential areas – to say nothing of the effects exposure to these poisons has on farm workers or on the consumers who eat GMO crops.
The could be used to undercut efforts to protect all these people from the effects of this chemical violence.
If the DARK Act does become law, it is probably headed straight for court. That’s because the law is blatantly unconstitutional, infringing on states’ rights to regulate and agriculture within their borders.
“Whatever your views on GMOs, there is no Constitutional justification for the federal government to preempt state laws in this area,” the Campaign for Liberty said. “There certainly is no justification for Congress to preempt private sector efforts to meet consumer demands for non-GMO foods, while allowing those who support the use of GMOs to do so.”